My intention to travel
overseas and avoid the security hassle plus the 24-48 hours airport/flight
struggle was the reason I decided to book a back to back transatlantic cruise
on the Queen Mary 2, and I was looking forward to traveling the pleasurable way,
but it never occurred to me that this would turn out to be a very bad idea.
Other than a brief mention
about the number of days, that all sorts of delightful activities and such
which would be part of the cruise experience, plus the promise of formal nights
to enjoy unique cuisines amid the splendor of the appropriate ship's restaurant
(depending on the level of booking for cabins that were considered for the more
elaborate dinners available in the Princess Grill rather than in the Britannia
Restaurant), Cunard offered no other information.
Not one word was noted on
their website or in the literature sent to me about the daily time change that
would become for me an impossible race for enough daily time to eat, enjoy
activities and have moments to reflect in a deck chair about the beauty of an
ocean voyage, also to continue with the writing of my E-book city destination
series. I was looking forward to the cruise a way of a release from daily cares
and the usual staying in touch, which was I believe the primary reason for most
passengers to embark on such a trip.
Let me qualify this by
making a mention that early risers had no problem with time—those like me who
were looking forward to sleeping in and enjoying a leisurely breakfast in the
cabin never realized what was expected but not possible, not possible when an
hour forward took place at 12 noon daily for 8 days of the cruise.
After I inquired to Captain
William Wells (on board lecturer and maritime historian) as to why this
unexpected time conflict made my transatlantic 9-day cruise to Hamburg an
unpleasant experience, I was told the time change at noon, rather than when a
passenger was asleep, was instituted some 10 years ago as an innovation—I noted
that it was hell for me, and he laughed and said it was part of standard
transatlantic cruising operation, and he said this innovation was considered a
boon.
Yet Cunard never mentioned
any of this in their distributed literature or website. Nor did the good
Captain make mention of the fact that the return transatlantic from Southampton
to Red Hook, Brooklyn, New York did indeed make the time change (one hour
backward) while passengers were sleeping—I discovered this apparent disconnect
re an "innovation " and a "boon" when I took the return
transatlantic from Southampton.
Little did I know that worse
than an accelerated day due to the noon time change awaited me when I boarded
the Queen Mary 2 in Southampton on October 8—though when I arrived in Hamburg
on day 9 of the transatlantic cruise I was exhausted, yet I had 7 days yet
ahead to take trains and hopefully rest up before my return transatlantic
cruise. I didn't doubt that I would have those 7-days transatlantic back to Red
Hook, Brooklyn USA to rest and work on my E-book No More Hotels In Paris.
As I noted, I didn't realize
that a very bad idea would bring about one of the most uncomfortable and
unpleasant travel experiences I have ever had when I boarded the Queen Mary 2
at Southampton on October 8.
Please visit my other blogs:
Clarissa Max's blogGhostly Max's blog
My view of the world blog
Words and meanings blog
No comments:
Post a Comment